Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16636.1286414707@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance (Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
Ivan Voras <ivoras@freebsd.org> writes: > On 10/04/10 20:49, Josh Berkus wrote: >>> The other major bottleneck they ran into was a kernel one: reading from >>> the heap file requires a couple lseek operations, and Linux acquires a >>> mutex on the inode to do that. > Hmmm... lseek? As in "lseek() then read() or write()" idiom? It AFAIK > cannot be fixed since you're modifying the global "strean position" > variable and something has got to lock that. Um, there is no "global stream position" associated with an inode. A file position is associated with an open-file descriptor. If Josh quoted the problem correctly, the issue is that the kernel is locking a file's inode (which may be referenced by quite a lot of file descriptors) in order to change the state of one file descriptor. It sure sounds like a possible source of contention to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: