Re: New ODBC driver
От | markw@mohawksoft.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: New ODBC driver |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16614.24.91.171.78.1101913308.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: New ODBC driver ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-odbc |
> > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org >> [mailto:pgsql-odbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of >> markw@mohawksoft.com >> Sent: 01 December 2004 13:50 >> To: pgsql-odbc@postgresql.org >> Subject: [ODBC] New ODBC driver >> >> What would be the best way to go about re-writing the ODBC >> driver to use libpq? (I haven't looked at the code in years, >> the last time I looked at it was to find a memory leak.) >> >> Is it possible to do it in stages? >> >> Is the transport sufficiently separated to do a quick change >> to use libpq as the transport, and then gradually use more and more? >> >> My only concern would be that a re-write would re-break a lot >> of functionality. > > I haven't looked at it in depth, but I think you will essentially just > need to rewrite connection.c as a libpq wrapper. > > I don't think it would be realistic to mix the two approaches though - > if only because they couldn't share a single database connection. Why is this an issue? Why not create multiple connections? > > Regards, Dave.
В списке pgsql-odbc по дате отправления: