Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16586.1228067371@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > There are two ways to fix this, both having some validity: > 1. We create a second version of pg_get_function_arguments() that produces > arguments without default values decoration. This is probably the > technically sound thing to do. Yes. I think that the argument for allowing parameter names in commands like ALTER FUNCTION is that the user might consider them part of the function's identity. This can hardly be claimed for default values. Also, there's a third possibility: we could revert the decision to allow pg_dump to depend on pg_get_function_arguments in the first place. That was really the lazy man's approach to begin with. The more we allow pg_dump to depend on backend functions that work in a SnapshotNow world, the more risk we have of producing inconsistent dumps. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: