Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> As Noah I think it'd be good if we, over time, started to document a few
> more things one currently have to pick up over time. I'm wondering
> whether these should be subsections under a new sect1 ('Code Structure'?
> Don't like that much), or all independent sect1s.

"Structure" is certainly not what this material is.  Maybe "Miscellaneous
Coding Conventions" is the best we can do for a title.  The items seem too
short to be their own <sect1>'s.

> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?

Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.
        regards, tom lane