Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1655.972173604@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Navigating time-warps in the CVS tree (was re the rule system) ("Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@pacbell.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Kevin O'Gorman" <kogorman@pacbell.net> writes: > so I tried going back to '7 Oct 2000 10:00:00 PST' and it's better, > but regression tests fail on the rule system. It makes the server > die. Since rules are what I want, this won't do. Details? AFAIK, the system was operational on 7-Oct; I did not pick that date out of the air. There was a broken version of the expected/rules.out file in place right around then --- see http://www.postgresql.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/pgsql/src/test/regress/expected/rules.out But that'd just have caused a bogus comparison failure, not a server crash. (What was *in the expected file* was a report of a server crash :-(, so if you didn't look carefully at the diff you might've gotten confused...) If you want a more exact timestamp, try 7-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which predates the BEOS patch breakage, or 8-Oct-2000 00:00 PDT which follows cleanup. If either of those fail on your system it'd be useful to know about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: