Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16525.1271730549@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plpgsql GUC variable: custom or built-in?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 9:51 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: >> The problem is that making a "custom" variable SUSET doesn't really >> work: the system will not accept a value that's assigned before the >> loadable module is loaded, even if it was assigned by a superuser. >> I suggested a fix in the referenced thread, but it's not exactly an >> ideal fix. > Well, at this point the issue is deciding whether we're going to try > to do anything about this before beta. The reason it seems of concern for 9.0 is that now we have a custom SUSET variable in plpgsql. If we don't fix this then we need to think hard about the alternative of forcing the variable into the core code to avoid the gotchas. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: