Re: "Bugs" CF?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Bugs" CF? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16478.1431049365@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: "Bugs" CF? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: "Bugs" CF?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On 5/7/15 9:44 AM, Stephen Frost wrote: >> a) make sure we don't lose track of bug-fix patches >> b) make it clear where bug-fix patches should be submitted >> c) provide a view of bug-fix patches for people to look at outside of >> CF time >> d) continue to have a single view which includes all active patches >> with bug fixes listed first > I think these goals are valid, but are adequately served by the current > setup. Not sure I agree with that ... > I think having a separate bucket for bugs would just lead to lots of > discussions over what qualifies as a bug. ... but I do agree with this. With our current methodology there's not a lot of need to decide a-priori whether something is a feature or a bug (in particular, the way it's categorized in the CF app is not a high-stakes decision). I think that's just as well. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: