Re: Max size of a btree index entry
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Max size of a btree index entry |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16470.1153347824@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Max size of a btree index entry ("Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Max size of a btree index entry
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2006 at 10:02:49AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> 1. In a non-rightmost page, we need to include a "high key", or page >> boundary key, that isn't one of the useful data keys. > Why does a leaf page need a boundary key? So you can tell whether a proposed insertion ought to go into this page, or the one to its right. The tree descent logic doesn't guarantee that you descend to exactly the correct page --- if concurrent page splits are going on, you might have to "move right" one or more times after reaching the leaf level. You need the boundary key to make this test correctly. And of course, the reason there's no high key on the rightmost page is exactly that it has no right-hand neighbor, hence no upper limit on its delegated key space. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: