Re: pg_dumpall storing multiple copies of DB's?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_dumpall storing multiple copies of DB's? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16469.1015348162@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_dumpall storing multiple copies of DB's? (Bill McGonigle <mcgonigle@medicalmedia.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_dumpall storing multiple copies of DB's?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill McGonigle <mcgonigle@medicalmedia.com> writes: > ... Unless 7.1.3 has code to prevent duplicates and > 7.0 (old system) didn't I would suspect pg_shadow looks the same now as > it did then. There is a unique index to prevent duplicate usesysid in 7.2, but not in 7.1. However, it doesn't look like 7.0's pg_dumpall did a join anyway, so that's not the explanation. > The current system, which only has one pg_shadow entry for the > database's datdba, is still producing the dumps with multiple copies. > When I run: > SELECT datname, coalesce(usename, (select usename from pg_shadow where > usesysid=(select datdba from pg_database where datname='template0'))), > pg_encoding_to_char(d.encoding), datistemplate, datpath FROM pg_database > d LEFT JOIN pg_shadow u ON (datdba = usesysid) WHERE datallowconn; > (from pg_dumpall) I only see one copy of the database. Most curious. What exactly do you see from that query? I'm wondering if pg_dumpall's simplistic parsing of the output ("while read ...") is getting fooled by embedded spaces or some such. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: