Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead assignment
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead assignment |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16440.1332791632@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead assignment (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Remove dead assignment
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On mån, 2012-03-26 at 15:15 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> I also do not think it does anything for readability for this call >> of read_info() to be unexpectedly unlike all the others. > I do not think that it is good code quality to assign something to a > variable and then assign something different to a variable later in the > same function. Well, that's a totally different issue, because if we had used a different variable for the other purpose, this assignment would still be dead and coverity would still be whinging about it, no? The problem that I have with this change (and the similar ones you've made elsewhere) is really that it's only chance that the code isn't fetching anything from the result of read_info. If we subsequently wanted to change the logic so it did do that, we'd have to put back the assignment. That sort of code churn benefits nobody. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: