Re: Table Spaces
От | pgsql@mohawksoft.com |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Table Spaces |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16387.24.91.171.78.1085076544.squirrel@mail.mohawksoft.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Table Spaces ("Andrew Dunstan" <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> pgsql@mohawksoft.com wrote: >> Imagine this scenario: >> >> OpenFoobar is released as GPL. Portions of his code are found in >> PostgreSQL. The new owner of OpenFoobar is an IP lawyer. They claim >> ownership of code "derived" from "his" code. There is now a valid, or >> at least legally arguable, argument that PostgreSQL now demands GPL >> source availability. >> >> I use PostgreSQL as a database foundation or my search-engine. Much of >> my system is open source, but there are portions which are not. If the >> IP lawyer is a competitor, he can force me to release my code. > > > This is a common misconception. It ain't so. According to Eblen Moglen: > > > "The claim that a GPL violation could lead to the forcing open of > proprietary code that has wrongfully included GPL'd components is simply > wrong. There is no provision in the Copyright Act to require distribution > of infringing work on altered terms. What copyright plaintiffs are > entitled to, under the Act, are damages, injunctions to prevent infringing > distribution, and--where appropriate--attorneys' fees. A defendant found > to have wrongfully included GPL'd code in its own proprietary work can be > mulcted in damages for the distribution that has already occurred, and > prevented from distributing its product further. That's a sufficient > disincentive to make wrongful use of GPL'd program code. And it is all > that the Copyright Act permits." > > I have mixed feelings about the GPL myself, but I hate seeing this FUD so > frequently. This isn't FUD, I release GPL code. Maybe I detailed a specific "conclusion" instead of a process. One of the obvious remedies for GPL "damages" would be to open the code. > > In any case, the whole thing that kicked off this discussion is *not* GPL > software. So let's get on with our business. Agreed, but, PostgreSQL is a great product/project, it has the ability to challenge *big* database companies, and *big* companies have blood sucking IP lawyers. A little care and attention now will pay down the road.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: