BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
От | PG Bug reporting form |
---|---|
Тема | BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-mask fields |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16380-45bf493d620bc29c@postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
The following bug has been logged on the website: Bug reference: 16380 Logged by: Arthur Nascimento Email address: tureba@gmail.com PostgreSQL version: 12.2 Operating system: Documentation Description: Hi, I see a couple of inconsistencies in the documentation of the pg_hba.conf file in v12+: https://www.postgresql.org/docs/12/auth-pg-hba-conf.html (and /current/) 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats. The ones on host[no]gssenc were added to the IP-address/IP-mask section, but not to the address section. I believe the intention was to have 11 lines there, with a corresponding count at the top. 2. In the address and IP-address/IP-mask descriptions, there's "This field only applies to host, hostssl, and hostnossl records." and "These fields only apply to host, hostssl, and hostnossl records.". But those lists should probably be updated as well to add host[no]gssenc (or to negate the logic, saying they are not applied to local connections). Thanks, Arthur
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: