Re: [HACKERS] merging duplicate definitions of adjust_relid_set

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> While reviewing Ashutosh Bapat's partitionwise join code, I noticed
> he'd run up against the problem that adjust_relid_set() is defined as
> static in two different source files, and he wanted to call it from a
> third file.  I didn't much like his solution to that problem, which
> was to rename one of them and make that definition non-static; I think
> it would be better to keep the existing name and stop defining it in
> multiple places.  However, I discovered that there wasn't really an
> obviously-good place to put the function; neither prepunion.c nor
> rewriteManip.c, the two files that contain static versions as of now,
> seem like an appropriate place from which to expose it, and I didn't
> find anything else that I was wildly in love with, either.  The
> attached patch puts it in var.c, because it didn't look horrible and I
> thought it wasn't worth creating a new file just for this.

> Objections, better ideas?

I think it might be better to define it as a fundamental Bitmapset
operation in nodes/bitmapset.c, along the lines of

Bitmapset *bms_replace_member(const Bitmapset *bms, int member, int repl);

This API would probably require giving up the property of not copying the
set unless it changes, but I doubt that that's performance critical.
        regards, tom lane