Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16304.1316364212@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote: >> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said. >> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should >> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works >> outside the project is of no use at all. > Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate? +1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for appropriate purposes. I guess the real question is, exactly what will be the requirements for joining? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: