Re: ToDo: preload for fulltext dictionary
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: ToDo: preload for fulltext dictionary |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867791002160043u46213690v7fba2c78df40b563@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: ToDo: preload for fulltext dictionary (Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/2/16 Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>: > > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > >> The dictionary data could be shared or minimally dictionary could be >> preloaded like some PL language. >> >> What do you think about this? > > Surely preloading is the most realistic approach, but I hope we would support > dynamic allocation of shared memory, and load dictionaries in the area and > share it with backends. We should avoid additonal calls of shmget() or mmap() > in the additional shared memory allocation, but we can shrink shared buffers > and reuse the area for general purposes. We often have serveral GB of shared > buffers nowadays, so dividing some MB of buffers will not be problem. > I am for all solution, but using a shared memory isn't realistic now, and can be a problem on MS Windows. More - it can be difficult with some special custom non ro dictionaries. Regards Pavel > Regards, > --- > Takahiro Itagaki > NTT Open Source Software Center > > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: