Re: bugfix - VIP: variadic function ignore strict flag
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: bugfix - VIP: variadic function ignore strict flag |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867791002091008m22494ffdqa2291103d1311d28@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: bugfix - VIP: variadic function ignore strict flag (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/2/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> 2010/2/9 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: >>> So what? "variadic any" is different in a lot of ways. > >> implementation is different, but from users perspective there can not >> be differences. I am not sure. From my programmer's view is all ok. >> But I believe so from customer view, there can be a surprise - because >> NULL value doesn't skip function call. > > It's going to be a bit surprising in any case. If I write > > foo(1, VARIADIC ARRAY[2, NULL]) > > then what I'm passing is not a null, and so I'd be surprised if the > function wasn't executed. > > I think we should just document this, not make a definitional change > that seems as likely to break applications as fix them. really I am not sure, what is good solution. Maybe can speak some other. Pavel > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: