Re: Review: listagg aggregate
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: listagg aggregate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867791001280919u306afd90rfc3a61989eb023e7@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: listagg aggregate (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: listagg aggregate
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2010/1/28 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> in 99.99% the second argument will be a constant. Can we use this >> information and optimize function for this case? > >> The detoast on every row can take some percent from a performance. > > What detoast? There won't be one for a constant, nor even for a > variable in any sane situation --- who's going to be using > multi-kilobyte delimiter values? And if they do, aren't they likely > to run out of memory for the result long before the repeated detoasts > become an interesting problem? You're arguing about a case that > seems quite irrelevant to the real world. > I asking with get_fn_expr_arg_stable() we are able to fix second parameter without some performance issues. Regards Pavel > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: