Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0, Postgres vs. PostgreSQL

2010/1/21 Greg Sabino Mullane <greg@turnstep.com>:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: RIPEMD160
>
>
>>> Better yet, how about we bite the bullet and make the name change
>>> official. Seems like a major version bump is the right time
>>> to do it.
>
>> I thought we ended up that thread already?
>
> Well, the thread may have ended, but the problem remains. Call
> it the 900 pound gorilla in a room full of elephants. I know
> many people are loathe to see the discussion come up again,
> but as long as the project is saddled with its ugly and
> unweildy official name, it has a large problem.

it is your opinion - not my. I thing, so is nonsense returning to
closed chapters.

Regards
Pavel

>
> It's really in the best interests of the project to make the
> change as soon as possible, and undo the mistake of changing
> it from Postgres in the first place. Changing it to coincide
> with the interest bounce we'll get from the Oracle/MySQL
> situation seems a no-brainer from an advocacy perspective.
>
> - --
> Greg Sabino Mullane greg@turnstep.com
> PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 201001211135
> http://biglumber.com/x/web?pk=2529DF6AB8F79407E94445B4BC9B906714964AC8
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> iEYEAREDAAYFAktYgw0ACgkQvJuQZxSWSsjgSwCghMphV61CIRDBGGscItZxvVQ9
> E54AnjGqqYuXewjmwszaXX0sP7oWlg68
> =DQfT
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
>