2009/10/19 Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>:
> 2009/10/19 Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>:
>> On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> sure, you have to fix fulnerable application. But with some
>>> unsophisticated using %a and using wrong tools, the people can be
>>> blind and don't register an SQL injection attack.
>>
>> If they're logging the statements (which they presumably are if
>> looking for unusual activity), then they'll see the attack:
>>
>> dpage@myapp: LOG: connection authorized: user=dpage database=postgres
>> dpage@myapp: LOG: statement: set application_name='hax0red';
>> dpage@hax0red: LOG: disconnection: session time: 0:00:20.152
>> user=dpage database=postgres host=[local]
>>
>
> this is bad solution. yes, I can found probmlematics rows, but I'll
> get ten or more larger log. This is available only when loging of
> application name changes depend on own configuration setting.
>
what is +/- same as GUC for write access to application name.
Pavel
> Regards
> Pavel
>>
>> --
>> Dave Page
>> EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com
>>
>