Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790812311013k27276e8ek8ddbe4968264965a@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: version() output vs. 32/64 bits
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hello 2008/12/31 Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: > Tom Lane wrote: >> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> > On Wednesday 31 December 2008 04:45:01 Bruce Momjian wrote: >> >> PostgreSQL 8.4devel on i386-pc-bsdi4.3.1, compiled by GCC 2.95.3, 32-bit >> >> > Maybe we should separate all that, e.g., >> >> > SELECT version(); => 'PostgreSQL 8.4devel' >> > SELECT pg_host_os(); => 'bsdi4.3.1' >> > SELECT pg_host_cpu(); => 'i386' (although this is still faulty, as per my >> > original argument; needs some thought) >> > SELECT pg_compiler(); => 'GCC 2.95.3' >> > SELECT pg_pointer_size(); => 4 (or 32) (this could also be a SHOW variable) >> >> Seems like serious overkill. No one has asked for access to individual >> components of the version string, other than the PG version number >> itself, which we already dealt with. > > Maybe we could have a separate function which returned the info in > various columns (OUT params). Maybe it would be useful to normalize the > info as reported the buildfarm, which right now is a bit ad-hoc. > All should be GUC read only variables - It is cheep. regards Pavel Stehule > -- > Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ > The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: