Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790812120547l5eaae852q75822c25e0ea4324@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: WIP: default values for function parameters ("David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: WIP: default values for function parameters
Re: WIP: default values for function parameters Re: WIP: default values for function parameters Re: WIP: default values for function parameters |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2008/12/12 David E. Wheeler <david@kineticode.com>: > On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > >> So I think that really this is never going to fly unless it uses a >> keyword-looking reserved word. And we're not going to take some short >> word that's not reserved now and suddenly make it so. So, despite >> Pavel's objection that the AS syntax proposal might be confused with >> other uses of AS, I seriously doubt that any proposal is going to get >> accepted that doesn't recycle AS or some other existing reserved word. when I should exactly identify param name, the we should to use any symbols. > > I'm okay with AS if that's the way it has to be, but what about a colon > right at the end of the label? A cast is two colons, so no conflict there: > > SELECT foo(1, name: 'bar', quantity: 10); it's look well, but I still prefer some combination with = name: = '' name: => ''' :name = '' $name => .. $name = .. Maybe I am too conservative Pavel > > No doubt I'm missing something… > > Best > > David
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: