Re: proposal sql: labeled function params

Hello

2008/8/23 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>:
> On Friday 22 August 2008 07:41:30 Decibel! wrote:
>> If we're really worried about it we can have a GUC for a few versions
>> that turns off named parameter assignment. But I don't think we
>> should compromise the design on the theory that some folks might be
>> using that as an operator *and* can't change their application to
>> wrap it's use in ().
>
> Even if that were a reasonable strategy, you can't use GUC parameters to alter
> parser behavior.
>

I thing, so it's possible - in this case. We should transform named
params to expr  after syntax analyze.

Pavel