Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790808181341r1a0fb37doc8dd8e1e9d260fdf@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures (Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Patch: plan invalidation vs stored procedures
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2008/8/18 Hannu Krosing <hannu@2ndquadrant.com>: > On Mon, 2008-08-18 at 11:05 +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: >> 2008/8/18 Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine@hi-media.com>: >> > Hi, >> > >> > Le lundi 18 août 2008, Andrew Dunstan a écrit : >> >> > On Sat, Aug 16, 2008 at 09:40:19PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> >> >> This is not the kind of patch we put into stable branches. >> >> >> >> So what? That is not the only criterion for backpatching. >> > >> > I fail to understand why this problem is not qualified as a bug. >> > >> >> Does it change of result some queries? > > Not in the long run, but not invalidating the functions (current > behaviour) postpones seeing the results of function change until DBA > manually restarts the error-producing client. > >> It is protection to server's hang? > > Can't understand this question :( > > If you mean, does the change protect against hanging the server, then > no, currently the server does not actually hang, it just becomes > unusable until reconnect :( Hi I am sorry, but it's really new feature and not bug fix Pavel > > --------- > Hannu > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: