Re: Using Postgres as an alias
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Using Postgres as an alias |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790709261539j2fa80da4wac68fd1db06d889c@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Using Postgres as an alias ("Dave Page" <dpage@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Using Postgres as an alias
|
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
> > > > Devrim's argument about renaming all packages is really strong for me. > > I think you missed the point of promoting the preferred short name entirely - it doesn't require changing of any packagesat all. > > Think of it like an acronym in a paper. You spell it out the first time you use it, then use the short form thereafter.Similarly we can use the full name in packages, titles, introductions etc. and the short form in body text whereit improves flow when reading. > I haven't problem with using it in any articles, books, etc. But in technical documentation I prefer using only official full name. That's all. I was happy with FAQ compromise, and I hoped so this unsensed debate was finished. But this is new opening closed question. Pavel
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: