Re: set returning functions.
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: set returning functions. |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790709250729y2498a494pce31cbd49042ef95@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: set returning functions. ("Scott Marlowe" <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: set returning functions.
|
Список | pgsql-general |
2007/9/25, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>: > On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > 2007/9/25, Rhys Stewart <rhys.stewart@gmail.com>: > > > yes indeed. thats exactly it scott!!! > > > > > > On 9/24/07, Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 9/24/07, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Hello Rhys > > > > > > > > > > its not mystery > > > > > > > > Yeah, but I think he wanted to be able to make his own function he > > > > could call like: > > > > > > > > select myfunc(10); > > > > > > > > Then you have to use sql language > > > > create or replace function mysrf(int) > > returns setof integer as $$ > > select i from generate_series(1, $1) g(i); > > $$ language sql; > > Do you HAVE to use sql plsql to get this to work? I thought that all > pl languages worked like this with pgsql. > if you can call SRF function in normal context (like SELECT srf()), you have to use SQL language Pavel
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: