Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 162867790706300029n5d60bf86r3c160e6509393607@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres (Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>) |
Ответы |
Re: greatest/least semantics different between oracle and postgres
|
Список | pgsql-general |
Hello, I have not Oracle, so I cannot test it, but PostgreSQL implementation respect Oracle: http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2005-06/msg00431.php Regards Pavel Stehule 2007/6/30, Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to>: > The following is just FYI. > I was recently doing some stuff with greatest() on oracle (9.2.0.8.0) and > noticed that it returned null if ANY of the arguments were null. Out of > curiosity I checked postgres' definition of that function and found that it > returns null only if ALL of the arguments are null. > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 1: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: