Re: Coalesce bug ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Coalesce bug ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16273.1356106553@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Coalesce bug ? ("David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Coalesce bug ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com> writes: > The first case is: > SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT), (SELECT) ); I am not sure exactly what the parentheses surrounding the scalar-sub-SELECTs do(turn them into anonymously typed rows?) but if the first scalar-sub-select results in a non-null result then the secondone should not be executed. Indeed, COALESCE will not execute the second sub-select at runtime, but that doesn't particularly matter here. What matters is that "ps3(2)" qualifies to be pre-evaluated (folded to a constant) at plan time. So that happens, and the RAISE message comes out, at plan time. What's left at run time is SELECT COALESCE( (SELECT 1), (SELECT 2) ); and indeed the "SELECT 2" is skipped at that point, as is visible in the EXPLAIN ANALYZE measurements. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: