Re: BLOBs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BLOBs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16259.992386929@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BLOBs (Thomas Swan <tswan@olemiss.edu>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Thomas Swan <tswan@olemiss.edu> writes: > I think I missed what I was trying to say in my original statement. I > think there's a way to use the existing API with performance benefits > left intact. > Take for example the table : > create table foo { > foo_id serial, > foo_name varchar(32), > foo_object BLOB, > ); > On the insert statement "insert into foo (foo_name,foo_object) values > ('My Object','{some escaped arbitrary string of binary data}');", flush > the {some escaped arbitrary string of binary data} to disk as a > temporary file. Then do the lo_import operation transparent to the user. > On a select, do the same thing (transparently) and return the data back > to user. > Personally, I like LO's being stored separately from the actual table. I still think you've rediscovered TOAST. How is this better than (or even significantly different from) foo_object being a toastable bytea column? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: