Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5)
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16214.1458615257@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C" (PostgreSQL 9.5) (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Missing rows with index scan when collation is not "C"
(PostgreSQL 9.5)
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> writes: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:44 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com> wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 5:26 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> If that is the case, I'd argue that's a glibc problem, not our >>>> problem. Of course, we could provide an option to disable abbreviated >>>> keys for the benefit of people who need to work around buggy libc >>>> implementations. FWIW, I do not think you can dismiss it as "not our bug" if a large fraction of existing glibc installations share the issue. It might be a glibc bug, but we'll have to find a workaround. > Maybe we can write a test-case that lets check_strxfrm_bug() detect > this issue, which would be ideal. But, again, I need to see what's > going on with strxfrm() on affected systems before I can do anything. Happy to test if you can provide a test case. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: