thread safety
От | Lee Kindness |
---|---|
Тема | thread safety |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16211.32489.732854.901389@kelvin.csl.co.uk обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | thread safety ("Mendola Gaetano" <mendola@bigfoot.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: thread safety
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Probably because I worked on thread safety and produced a patch. If someone done the same for PITR and produced a patch i'm sure it would have generated much more interest. I couldn't have done PITR, so no loss of resource there. Was Bruce planning to do the PITR work? If so I guess a lot of his time's been spent on integrating patches and the like - leaving less time for other developments. L. Mendola Gaetano writes:> I seen on this list a lot of energy ( also little flames involving SCO > & Co. ) spent on threadsafety;> was really necessary spent so much energy in this direction?> I was at Fosdem in Bruxelles ( I spoke thereabout the use> of postgres in my project ) and I seen al people there > was really exicited about the anticipation ofBruce Momjian > about the PITR in 7.4 but how we know there was no time for it> > May be I'm wrong but I'd like know whythread safety was so> necessary.> > > Regards> Gaetano Mendola>
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: