Re: A little help interpreting a query plan
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A little help interpreting a query plan |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16209.1330041090@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | A little help interpreting a query plan (Andy Chambers <achambers@mcna.net>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
Andy Chambers <achambers@mcna.net> writes: > We have two copies of roughly* the same database (in a single > cluster), and on one of them, the query above runs much faster and > postgresql produces a different query plan for each one. It actually > returns the same results in both instances. Can anyone think of why > there is such a difference in performance? Comparisons like this: > -> Index Scan using claim_attachments_claim on > claim_attachments ca (cost=0.00..10.10 rows=2 width=0) (actual > time=0.004..0.004 rows=0 loops=1741) > Index Cond: (claim_id = clm.id) > -> Index Scan using claim_attachments_claim on > claim_attachments ca (cost=0.00..10241.71 rows=2 width=0) (actual > time=17.884..17.884 rows=0 loops=1741) > Index Cond: (claim_id = clm.id) make it appear that the "slow" DB is rather horribly bloated. I wonder what your vacuuming policy is like ... regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: