Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16190.1090091906@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > Tom Lane wrote: >> What is the point of having both archive_program and archive_dest as >> GUC variables? > I assume archive_dest is used for both archive and recovery of archives. You assume wrong; it's not used there. There isn't any real good reason to suppose that the recovery process is going to fetch the files from exactly where archiving put them, anyhow. > I think the idea is that you would turn archiving on and off regularly Why in the world would you do that? People who want PITR at all will want it 24x7. > while you might never change the archive_command value. Also, how would > you disable it? Set it to "", and if you do, you then have not way to > remember your command string when you want to re-enable it. Leave the original value in a comment, if you're going to want it again later. I don't think any of the above arguments outweigh the risk of people shooting themselves in the foot by enabling archive_mode without specifying a proper command/destination. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: