Re: Rule or Function and Trigger?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rule or Function and Trigger? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1618.1238770704@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rule or Function and Trigger? ("James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rule or Function and Trigger?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
"James B. Byrne" <byrnejb@harte-lyne.ca> writes: > I am beginning to migrate some functionality from an application > prototype into the DBMS. One of these elements is time stamping row > insertions and updates. > I have been reading about rules, functions and triggers in regards > to this issue. So, of course, now I have myself completely > befuddled. From what I can determine from the documentation, it > makes little difference to the DBMS whether I set a rule on insert > and one on update for each table or define a function and set a > trigger for insert or update on each table. > If this is indeed the case then which way is the preferred method? A trigger is very much preferred. Rules are not as easy as they look. Triggers are a bit more notationally cumbersome, but they tend to do what you expect without any surprises. For the problem you mention, a stripped-down version of the first example here is what you want: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.3/static/plpgsql-trigger.html regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: