Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version() |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16176.1516200980@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version() (Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: Package version in PG_VERSION and version()
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Christoph Berg <christoph.berg@credativ.de> writes: > Re: Tom Lane 2018-01-17 <15537.1516200157@sss.pgh.pa.us> >> IMO there's not really any evidence that we need an additional mechanism >> in this space. I don't see any way to get that evidence unless some >> packager tries to use the existing mechanism and hits insurmountable >> problems. > The problem is that the problems will likely not be in my/our/Debian's > realm, but in anything that uses our packages downstream. E.g. the > "official" Docker images are using our packages. There is no way to > test that external stuff without actually publishing the packages for > production consumption. Yeah, but the same argument could be made against the variant you're proposing. In theory, people could have written arbitrarily brittle checks of version numbers/strings. I'm not exactly convinced that it's your (or our) problem if they did. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: