Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16175.1386258393@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server
log?
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com> writes: > Shouldn't we lower the severity or avoiding those messages to server log? No. They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned. Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think any change in the code behavior would be an improvement. > 1. FATAL: the database system is starting up > 2. FATAL: the database system is shutting down > 3. FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode > 4. FATAL: sorry, too many clients already > Report these as FATAL to the client because the client wants to know the > reason. But don't output them to server log because they are not necessary > for DBAs (4 is subtle.) The notion that a DBA should not be allowed to find out how often #4 is happening is insane. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: