Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16168.1056341196@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Two weeks to feature freeze (Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu>) |
Ответы |
Re: Two weeks to feature freeze
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Sailesh Krishnamurthy <sailesh@cs.berkeley.edu> writes: > I'm not sure if I understand Tom's beef - I think he is concerned > about what happens if a subordinate does not respond to a prepare > message. I would assume that the co-ordinator would not let the commit > go through until it has received confirmations from every > subordinate. No. I want to know what the subordinate does when it's promised to commit and the co-ordinator never responds. AFAICS the subordinate is screwed --- it can't commit, and it can't abort, and it can't expect to make progress indefinitely on other work while it's holding locks for the not-quite-committed transaction. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: