Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade --jobs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16144.1554588125@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade --jobs (senor <frio_cervesa@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade --jobs
|
Список | pgsql-general |
senor <frio_cervesa@hotmail.com> writes: > Since pg_upgrade is in control of how it is calling pg_dump, is there a reason pg_upgrade cannot use the directory outputformat when calling pg_dump? Is the schema-only operation incompatible? Well, there's no point in it. pg_dump can only parallelize data dumping, and there's none to be done in the --schema-only case that pg_upgrade uses. Also, since pg_upgrade *does* use parallelism across multiple pg_dump calls (if you've got multiple databases in the cluster), it'd be a bit problematic to have another layer of parallelism below that, if it did indeed do anything. You don't want "--jobs=10" to suddenly turn into 100 sessions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: