Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16101.1181841998@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: tsearch_core patch: permissions and security issues
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com> writes: > O.k. I am not trying to throw any cold water on this, but with the > limitations we are suggesting, does the patch gain us anything over just > leaving tsearch in contrib? Well, if you want to take a hard-nosed approach, no form of the patch would gain us anything over leaving it in contrib, at least not from a functionality standpoint. The argument in favor has always been about perception, really: if it's a "core" feature not an "add-on", then people will take it more seriously. And there's a rather weak ease-of-use argument that you don't have to install a contrib module. (The idea that it's targeted at people who can't or won't install a contrib module is another reason why I think we can skip user-defined parsers and dictionaries ...) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: