Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16031.1090090426@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Point in Time Recovery
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
[ ... some desultory reading of PITR patch ... ] What is the point of having both archive_program and archive_dest as GUC variables? Wouldn't it be simpler to fold them into one parameter, viz archive_command = 'cp %s /archivedir' For that matter, do we need a separate archive_mode boolean? The one thing I can positively guarantee about archive_dest (or archive_command) is that we cannot come up with a useful default for it (no, /tmp isn't good). Therefore it does not seem very reasonable to let the user turn on archiving without having explicitly specified an archive destination. I propose that we fold all three GUC flags into a single archive_command string whose built-in default is an empty string, and you enable archiving by setting it to something nonempty. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: