Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted
От | denis.patron |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1602658054887-0.post@n3.nabble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #16663: DROP INDEX did not free up disk space: idle connection hold file marked as deleted (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund wrote > Hi, > > On 2020-10-14 12:05:10 +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: >> This is not a bug. >> >> At Fri, 09 Oct 2020 13:24:15 +0000, PG Bug reporting form < > noreply@ > > wrote in >> > The following bug has been logged on the website: >> > >> > Bug reference: 16663 >> > Logged by: Denis Patron >> > Email address: > denis.patron@ >> > PostgreSQL version: 11.9 >> > Operating system: CentOS 7 >> > Description: >> > >> > I have an index, which at the file system level, is made up of multiple >> > segments (file: > <id> > .1, > <id> > .2 ecc). When I DROP INDEX, the index is dropped >> > in Postgresql but at the file system level, the segments are marked as >> > "deleted". if I check with the lsof command, I see that the segments >> are in >> > use from an idle connection. This does not happen if the index is >> formed by >> > only one segment (in my case <1Gb). How can I prevent this? >> > thanks >> >> That references to deleted files will dissapear at the beginning of >> the next transaction. >> >> At the time a relation including an index is dropped, the first >> segment file (named as " > <id> > " without a suffix number) is left behind >> so the file is not shown as "(deleted)" in lsof output. > > I think we should consider either occasionally sending a sinval catchup > interrupt to backends that have been idle for a while, or to use a timer > that we use to limit the maximum time until we process sinvals. Just > having to wait till all backends become busy and process sinval events > doesn't really seem like good approach to me. > > Regards, > > Andres thanks for replying. the problem is that I have a very large database, with indexes of up to 70 Gb. while I redo the indexes in concurrently mode, if an idle transaction is using the index in question, the segment file (<id> _1 <id> _2 etc) of the index remains in the filesystem (marked as deleted) as long as the idle connection that it is blocking it does not make another transaction. this means that I can have hundreds of GB of space occupied by files marked "deleted", and this for hours. the risk is to run out of free space -- Sent from: https://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-bugs-f2117394.html
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: