Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Sat, Mar 19, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Nikhil Sontakke
> <nikhil.sontakke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:
>> Not really a performance issue AFAICS. If the relcache init file exists,
>> then the phase2 of the catalog cache which eventually calls the above code
>> path is avoided.
> Oh, that doesn't sound so bad, then.
I want to take a closer look at this one because I thought I'd covered
all those issues in the last go-round. But right offhand Nikhil's
analysis seems sane.
regards, tom lane