Re: SHMMAX seems entirely broken in OS X 10.4.2

"Luke Lonergan" <llonergan@greenplum.com> writes:
> Yes - it's very strange, I've had the same experience though I finally found
> that setting SHMMAX and SHMALL to the same values, namely 268435456, seems
> to work out fine.

Interesting.  I wonder if there's some bit of code that thinks that
SHMALL is measured in bytes (contrary to OSX's general convention
that it's measured in pages).
        regards, tom lane