Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16011.1180667958@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: Autovacuum versus rolled-back transactions
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes: > Our documentation says > | analyze threshold = analyze base threshold > | + analyze scale factor * number of tuples > | is compared to the total number of tuples inserted, updated, or deleted > | since the last ANALYZE. > but deleted tuples are not considered in the total number, because the delta > of {n_live_tuples + n_dead_tuples} is not changed by DELETE. We add the number > of DELETE into n_live_tuples and subtract it from n_dead_tuples. Yeah, I was concerned about that when I was making the patch, but didn't see any simple fix. A large number of DELETEs (without any inserts or updates) would trigger a VACUUM but not an ANALYZE, which in the worst case would be bad because the stats could have shifted. We could fix this at the cost of carrying another per-table counter in the stats info, but I'm not sure it's worth it. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: