Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16007.1243361129@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals
patch
Re: A couple of gripes about the gettext plurals patch |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: > I tried throwing various kinds of subtle garbage into the errmsg/ngettext > line, but it was all discovered by gcc -Wall. I experimented with this and found that indeed both format strings are checked ... if you have a reasonably recent libintl.h AND you have specified --enable-nls. Otherwise it all goes to heck, apparently because the compiler doesn't try to look through our substitute definition #define ngettext(s,p,n) ((n) == 1 ? (s) : (p)) So I'm still of the opinion that we need some work here. I think that instead of this #define we need an actual function that we can hang a couple of __attribute_format_arg__ markers on. Otherwise things are going to slip by us. (Not sure about you, but I don't build with --enable-nls by default.) regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: