Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 16006.1165508910@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases (Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases
Re: VACUUM and transactions in different databases |
Список | pgsql-general |
Bill Moran <wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> writes: > In response to Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>: >> Of course they are able to complete, but the point is that they would >> not remove the tuples that would be visible to that idle open >> transaction. > I would expect that, but the OP claimed that vacuum full waited until > the other transaction was finished. No, she didn't claim that. As far as I see she was just complaining about the failure to remove dead tuples: > > > > If I have a running transaction in database1 and try to vacuum > > > > database2 but the dead tuples in database2 cannot be removed. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: