Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for basetypes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15dde5d7-46db-ff9b-64e1-e240535e9534@iki.fi обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [BUGS] BUG #14706: Dependencies not recorded properly for base types (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On 06/16/2017 04:54 AM, Michael Paquier wrote: > On Fri, Jun 16, 2017 at 1:38 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> wrote: >> On 06/15/2017 07:31 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>> >>> Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi> writes: >>>> >>>> Hmm. Strictly speaking there's no need to update the dependency when >>>> changing opaque into cstring. Because cstring is a pinned type, >>>> recordDependency will do nothing for it. >>> >>>> But in any case, I think it'd be better and simpler to fix the >>>> dependency in SetFunctionArgType() and SetFunctionReturnType() functions >>>> themselves. They're the ones that change the type, they ought to be >>>> responsible for fixing the dependency too. See attached. >>> >>> Yeah, Heikki's version looks good to me. >>> >>> Heikki, are you going to commit/backpatch this, or do you want me to? >> >> I can do it, thanks. > > Fine for me. My first quick guess was better than what I coded at the > end, the idea being to wait after TypeCreate() to get the ObjectAdress > of the new type. Ok, committed and backported, thanks! - Heikki -- Sent via pgsql-bugs mailing list (pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-bugs
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: