Re: old server, new server, same performance
От | Scott Carey |
---|---|
Тема | Re: old server, new server, same performance |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15BF9CDD-456D-4157-A308-C76C6C631672@richrelevance.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: old server, new server, same performance (Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On May 14, 2010, at 3:52 PM, Scott Marlowe wrote: > 2010/5/14 Piotr Legiecki <piotrlg@sci.pam.szczecin.pl>: >> So what is the problem? My simple 'benchmarks' I have done with pgAdmin in >> spare time. >> >> pgAdmin is the latest 1.8.2 on both D and E. >> Using pgAdmin on my (D) computer I have run SELECT * from some_table; and >> noted the execution time on both A and B servers: > > So, any chance you'll run it like I asked: > > select count(*) from some_table; > > ? I agree that select * is a very bad test and probably the problem here. Even if you do 'select * from foo' locally to avoidthe network and pipe it to /dev/null, it is _significantly_ slower than count(*) because of all the data serialization. > > -- > Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: