Re: track_planning causing performance regression
От | Hamid Akhtar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: track_planning causing performance regression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 159784114193.7095.7438157679688812860.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: track_planning causing performance regression (Hamid Akhtar <hamid.akhtar@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
The following review has been posted through the commitfest application: make installcheck-world: tested, passed Implements feature: not tested Spec compliant: not tested Documentation: not tested Overall, the patch works fine. However, I have a few observations: (1) Code Comments: - The code comments should be added for the 2 new macros, in particular for PGSS_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS. As you explained inyour email, this may be used to limit the number of locks if a very large value for pgss_max is specified. - From the code I inferred that the number of locks can in future be less than pgss_max (per your email where in future thismacro could be used to limit the number of locks). I suggest to perhaps add some notes helping future changes in thiscode area. (2) It seems like that "pgss->lock = &(pgss->base + pgss_max)->lock;" statement should not use pgss_max directly and insteaduse PGSS_NUM_LOCK_PARTITIONS macro, as when a limit is imposed on number of locks, this statement will cause an overrun. -- Highgo Software (Canada/China/Pakistan) URL : www.highgo.ca ADDR: 10318 WHALLEY BLVD, Surrey, BC CELL:+923335449950 EMAIL: mailto:hamid.akhtar@highgo.ca SKYPE: engineeredvirus The new status of this patch is: Waiting on Author
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: