Re: Is Vacuum Working ?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is Vacuum Working ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 15866.1252076479@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Is Vacuum Working ? ("Thorne, Francis" <thornef@cromwell.co.uk>) |
Список | pgsql-admin |
"Thorne, Francis" <thornef@cromwell.co.uk> writes: > Information in Log file after database restart > 01/08/2009 - Next Transaction ID = 1400435363 > 01/09/2009 - Next Transaction ID = 1462025864 > Transaction_ID Wrapwround limit is 214784146 limited by database > postgres > Is this normal, I would have thought the transactional ID would have > stayed roughly the same due to vacuum ? If this keeps increasing will it > mean I am getting to close my 2 billion transaction limit ? Yeah, this looks perfectly normal. VACUUM doesn't make the next-XID counter go backwards. What it will do from time to time is push out the wraparound limit (by "freezing" very old rows' XID numbers). As long as there's a few million transactions' worth of daylight between the wrap limit and current XIDs, there's nothing to worry about. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: