Re: BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 1584605.1641674133@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2 (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #17358: While using --with-uuid=bsd option, uuid_ossp test fails on NetBSD 9.2
|
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes: > On 2022-01-08 14:59:56 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> Right, I was planning to have a look at how they'd done it. The BSD >> implementation seems to be inside the kernel, so that's not likely >> to be helpful, but the other two must be in userspace. > https://github.com/tytso/e2fsprogs/blob/master/lib/uuid/gen_uuid.c#L240 > https://github.com/sean-/ossp-uuid/blob/master/uuid_mac.c#L92 Thanks for the pointers! I was hoping for a Windows version, but neither one seems to cover that. OTOH, that means that we can't build uuid-ossp on Windows today anyway, so failing to support it makes things no worse than before ... and anybody who wants that can always send a patch. Before I start writing code, there seem to be two possible approaches here: 1. Rip out all the external-library dependencies, lock stock and barrel. contrib/uuid-ossp is always built. --with-uuid configure argument becomes a no-op or an error. 2. contrib/uuid-ossp is always built, but if you say --with-uuid then the existing code for that library is used. We fall back to homegrown code if you didn't say --with-uuid. The main argument for #2 would be to preserve bug compatibility with the existing behavior, in case (say) we pick a different interface's MAC address than you got before. I suppose also it's possible that the existing libraries try harder to avoid collisions across UUIDs generated in different processes than I envision doing in our own version. (I think v1 UUID uniqueness is snake-oil anyway, so I'm just thinking of choosing a random "clock sequence" in each process and calling it good.) Whether these are good enough reasons to continue carrying all that code is unclear to me. Thoughts? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: